Saturday, May 7, 2016

By Margaret Bailey


Approaches to surgical operation are changing and evolving mostly because of major technological advancements that are being made in various fields including surgical medicine. Single incision laparoscopic surgery is often referred to using the abbreviation SILS, but it also has many other names. Among the names SILS goes by are Single-port laparoscopy, single-port access surgery (SPA), Single-access endoscopic surgery (SAES), and single-port incisionnless conventional equipment-using surgery (SPICES). Other names include natural-orifice trannsumbilical surgery (NOTUS), one-port umbilical surgery (OPUS), and laparo-endoscopic singular-site surgery (LESS).

SILS as a technique under laparoscopic surgery is still a relatively new idea with a rather short history. It falls under minimally invasive techniques of surgical operations because of its use of one incision point. In many patients, the navel serves as the entry point. Small scars are formed from the process. The small size of the scar is among the reasons for high preference of the method by patients and surgeons.

Entry points are typically 11 or 22 mm incisions. One small incision is utilized as a way of minimizing scarring and pain during operations. Traditional laparoscopic operation is different from this new version because it uses multiple entry points. New York is home to some of the most qualified specialists in this field. Anyone searching for surgeons who specialize in SILS should visit this city.

The process makes use of specialized surgical equipment that can be classified into two major classes, that is hand and access ports instruments. There is a wide variety of access ports instruments including the GelPOINT system, SILS device, TriPort+, QuadPort+, TriPort15, and Uni-X. All these instruments are manufactured by different manufacturers.

Conversely, there are three key configurations of hand instruments in use. They include articulating, pre-bent rigid, and standard configurations. It has taken over the past thirty years to develop standard hand tools. They are made with rigid design. The SPL reduced triangulation instrument problem was solved by the development of articulation hand instruments.

A choice always has to be made between standard and articulating instruments by surgeons. Certain factors play a role in influencing that decision. Among those factors are cost, access port utilized, the level of training and skills commanded by the surgeon. It costs much more to use articulating instruments compared to using standard ones. However, the use of specialized tools promotes safety and efficiency.

The degree of awareness of SILS among surgeons is very high. However, the performance of SILS is limited to a few surgeons owing to its high level of complexity, limited space of access, and the use of specialized instruments. Surgical doctors who perform the procedure have to be highly skills and trained in surgical processes. That has promoted negative perception from the public and limited indulgence in the process.

A wide variety of surgeries makes use of SILS. Common examples comprise of sleeve gastrectomy, colectomy, adjustable gastric banding, appendectomy, nephrectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and hysterectomy among others. In European nations and the US, standard instruments are in wide usage when compared to specialized ones used in many other countries out of these two regions.




About the Author:



0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!